Skip to content

Maleficent is Too Busy Taking Names to Worry About the Haters

32
Share

Maleficent is Too Busy Taking Names to Worry About the Haters

Home / Maleficent is Too Busy Taking Names to Worry About the Haters
Movies & TV Maleficent

Maleficent is Too Busy Taking Names to Worry About the Haters

By

Published on June 2, 2014

Hush, haters. Imma tell you a story.
32
Share
Hush, haters. Imma tell you a story.

So… Maleficent has been panned by a lot of people. And while it is lacking in certain technical and structural merits, I’m not going to deny it—it’s lovely. Got some flaws, but if you’ve been holding out for a fairy tale retelling that manages to truly empower, this is where it’s at.

You’re just going to have to get over any issues you might have with Angelina Jolie. Yes, you.

Major spoilers for the film below.

The movie does not start out promisingly, which makes the journey even more interesting. We meet young fairy Maleficent in the “Moor” fairy kingdom across the way from the human one. She is probably about thirteen or so and already blessed with permanent lipstick. (It’s just weird.) When a boy wanders into the magic land to steal a crystal, they become fast friends and eventually fall in love. At least, that is how the story might have gone….

Maleficent, Stefan
Perma-lipstick. It's a fairy thing.

The orphan boy (named Stefan) has ambitions to get to the castle one day and leaves his fairy friend behind after offering her True Love’s Kiss—or so he claims. Years later, his buddy is defender of the Moors from the nasty king. When her show of power mortally wounds the royal, he tells the nobles (and Stefan, who is now his trusty man servant) that whoever brings him Maleficent’s head will be the new king and marry his daughter. Stefan goes back to hang out with his former girlfriend, but when he can’t bring himself to behead her, he drugs her and garrotes off her magnificent wings instead.

Wow. Subtle metaphor.

It is legitimately horrifying nonetheless. Stefan is king and Maleficent is vengeful. Since she can no longer fly, she rescues a crow from death and makes him her eyes and ears. (Diaval, played by Sam Riley, is one of the highlights of the film, an excellent friend, confidant and truth-teller to the woman who saves his life. It results in a villain-minion relationship that is never camp or pointlessly abusive for a change.) She finds out that her former flame and maimer now has a child, and the standard “Sleeping Beauty” curse is laid out in its usual fashion.

Maleficent, Angelina Jolie

Except for one tiny change: it is Maleficent who adds in the failsafe about True Love’s Kiss. A parting shot to the man who betrayed her.

At first it’s painfully same-old, same-old: hooray, angry evil woman created by man who refuses her love because that is the only thing that can turn a woman into a villain. Wouldn’t it have been great if she and Stefan had just been best friends? Why wouldn’t that betrayal have been enough given what he does to her?

In addition, the special effects are both overblown (worse than Snow White and the Huntsman, which is saying something) and seem to be ripping off other filmmakers—certain character designs look like we’re pulled from a Guillermo del Toro sketchbook, and the animation for Aurora’s trio of fairy guardians is plain awful. They also manage to make those the winged ladies imbeciles, rather than absent-minded, kindly aunt types. It doesn’t seem necessary at all.

Maleficent, fairies
WHY IS THE HAPPENING, MAKE IT STOP, WHAT ARE HEADS?

And yet suddenly everything changes. Maleficent keeps an eye on Aurora (ostensibly to be sure that the curse goes off without a hitch) and, because the fairies the are basically incompetent, ends up as the girl’s watchful guardian. When the princess is finally old enough, Maleficent introduces her to the fairy world and finds that the girl knows her—and what’s more, she thinks of the dark specter as her fairy godmother.

And rather than Sleeping Beauty’s guileless nature and good heart snagging her a prince, it melts the cold heart of a woman who would have seen her dead.

Elle Fanning is delightful as Aurora, and for those who have a problem with Angelina Jolie occupying the title role, I will say this—the woman is flawless. At a turning point in the film, she makes the choice to take on the cartoon character’s cadence and accent and it is clear how much love she has for the part. She’s funny, powerful, treacherous, and anything but a cardboard cut-out of cackling evil. Maleficent shines in her hands. The only thing that seems silly is the build-on to her facial features because who in this world looks at Jolie and thinks ‘MOAR CHEEKBONES’?

Maleficent, Aurora, Elle Fanning

Maleficent wants to end the girl’s curse and keep the child (Aurora tells her that she’d rather stay with the Moors as she nears her sixteenth birthday), but the curse is too strong and the princess eventually finds out the truth about what her fairy godmother did to her as an infant: enter Prince Phillip.

You know what the best thing about Phillip is here? He is completely useless. In fact, the movie makes a point of highlighting how pointless he is. Sure, he develops a crush and Aurora reciprocates, but when the curse falls, he is the first person to note that offering a kiss to a comatose girl seems super weird no matter how pretty he thought she was when she was conscious. Still, he’s their only hope, so he goes along… only to find his lips have no effect.

As Maleficent told Diaval: the reason why she chose that particular failsafe was because such a thing didn’t exist. So the fae queen is left with her failure to protect the one person who mattered most to her in the world, despite all her power. She tries to apologize to the girl, to tell her that she will never stop regretting her mistake and kisses her goodbye.

Aurora awakens.

YES MOVIE. VERY YES. THANK YOU FOR WINNING, I AM CRYING, LEAVE ME ALONE, THIS IS SO EMBARRASSING.

Maleficent, Angelina Jolie, Aurora

Any person who has ever cared about another human being knows that True Love comes in countless forms, but popular fairy tales created for mass-consumption (especially Disney ones) have never bothered to offer an alternative to some young prince who finds his maiden fair. And here it is. Maleficent loved that little girl, as a friend, a kindred spirit, a ward, and she revives Aurora through the sheer force of it, breaking the hold of her own formidable magic. I had honestly been hoping for that ending the moment it came clear that she cared about the baby, but I never imagined they would actually do it.

This story was needed. This story has been a long time coming. And going by the sniffles across my theater, this story is more than welcome to stay.

Of course King Stefan has spent sixteen years going crazy about the impending curse, so he’s not about to let Maleficent go without a fight. It’s unfortunate that his arc is so flimsy because the only way to make this film better would be if he had stepped back and learned something from his daughter. As is, he’s a teeth-gnashing villain who has to go. No one is sorry about it, given how many subjects he backhands over the course of the movie.

Maleficent, Angelina Jolie, Diaval, Sam Riley

But not before Aurora returns her fairy godmother’s wings. It’s is the goofiest gaping plothole of the film, knowing that Maleficent had the ability to regain her wings, but can’t before that moment because of… reasons? And still, it doesn’t matter—the entire audience in my theater applauded when they were restored to her. (The leather catsuit she is wearing during the battle is ridiculous no matter how you cut it, but you know, c’est la vie.)

And so Aurora becomes queen of Moors and humans alike, her godmother is healed and happy, and a new era of peace arrives. Because two women loved each other more than anything in this world. And maybe Aurora marries Phillip some day, but it hardly matters—he’s not who this story is about. He is an epilogue, an afterthought. And Maleficent is not a hero or a villain, but a real and complicated person all her own.

For a simple reimagining of a standard-issue Disney fairy tale, I’d call that a bit more than impressive. I hope they feel free to keep going in this direction for years to come.


Emmet Asher-Perrin is still all teary and doesn’t know what to do about that. You can bug her on Twitter and read more of her work here and elsewhere.

About the Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin

Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin is the News & Entertainment Editor of Reactor. Their words can also be perused in tomes like Queers Dig Time Lords, Lost Transmissions: The Secret History of Science Fiction and Fantasy, and Uneven Futures: Strategies for Community Survival from Speculative Fiction. They cannot ride a bike or bend their wrists. You can find them on Bluesky and other social media platforms where they are mostly quiet because they'd rather talk to you face-to-face.
Learn More About Emmet
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
10 years ago

I have a love/hate relationship with Once Upon A Time, but one of the things I love about it is that TWICE now they have done True Love’s Kiss that wasn’t romantic love. Nice to see Disney continue that trend.

A Unicorn
10 years ago

The movie does have quite a few problems, but the one thing that makes it absolutely worth watching is Jolie’s amazing performance as Maleficent.

Avatar
SWG
10 years ago

Two thoughts:

1. Kissing an unconscious woman is sexual assault, even if the fairy godmothers say “it’s ok, she’d really want it if she was awake to give consent.” Shame on the prince for getting talked into it despite his valid objections.

2. The “moor fairy kingdom” wasn’t really a kingdom because there wasn’t a king, or queen, before Maleficent went all psycho-dictator on them and took control with her power/army. Until then, they were (as clearly articulated) a happy land of self-actualizing individuals that coexisted in peace and harmony that contrasted the harsh dictatorship of the king next door.

Maleficent didn’t return the moors to what they were before as the story says, she merely turned it green. Where before they lived together in peace and harmony through tolerance and understanding, they now the yoke of a central authority figure. Aurora may make an initial good queen, but how many generations until there rises a dark ruler? A lot sooner than if there’s no ruler in the first place, that’s for certain.

Maleficent is a wonderful story that teaches us true love takes many forms, rape isn’t rape if someone gives consent on the unconscious victim’s behalf, and nobody can be truly happy unless subject to the rule of another.

And yes, the cheekbones were over the top.

Avatar
a1ay
10 years ago

Wait, the hero’s name is Prince Philip? This has massive, tragically underutilised comic potential. (“This is the moor fairy kingdom? Funny, I thought you’d all be browner.”)

Avatar
10 years ago

@3,
Curse-breaking kisses are more like mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

Avatar
Dr. Batman
10 years ago

@3 and 5, I completely agree with 5. It’s very extreme to say that kissing an unconscious person in an attempt to save them from the curse of neverending sleep (which is pretty much death) is a rape attempt. Please note that if I am ever cursed in such a way, I will accept kisses from all who think it may help. With that said, sounds like a very good alteration of the story and I just may go see it, despite those fairies looking quite awful in the picture provided.

Avatar
SWG
10 years ago

@5&6

I’m going to go ahead and assume you haven’t seen the movie. In the scene, the prince wakes with no clue of what’s going on or why he’s there. All he knows is he was riding to the castle and now is waking up on the floor in front of a bedroom door.

The fairies, upon discovering he’s a prince, grab him and drag him to the bed, demanding he kiss Aurora, a girl he met for a total of five minutes, and insist he kiss her.

HE raises objections about the morality of the situation; he doesn’t know her, she’s unconscious, and his only reason to do so would be his physical attraction to her, which isn’t sufficient.

They browbeat him until he finally relents, and when nothing happens they shove him out without explanation.

But you’re right, that girl “needed kissing”, and others should feel empowered to make that decision on her behalf.

Avatar
Dr. Batman
10 years ago

Touche, you’re right, I haven’t seen it. That does sound weird and off putting. However, I still feel it’s more like resuscitation than assault. Even if the curse stated “She shall only be awakened by true love’s punch in the face” it still seems like the punch in the face would be desireable. I’m not trying to upset anyone, I’m just saying.

Avatar
10 years ago

It seems that the prince got it right, in the end. It’s wrong to kiss an unconscious stranger. It is right to provide an unconscious stranger with emergency medical care.

But, of course, emergency medical care that takes the form of a kiss can’t then be “true love’s kiss.” The very clinical detachment that comes from providing medical care in an appropriate way ensures that the feeling behind the kiss won’t be “true love”, it will be genuine human compassion for someone who is dangerously ill, unconscious, and needing help.

Avatar
SWG
10 years ago

Very good point, Ursula! Ties up that thread quite nicely.

Anyway, Aurora is penultimate ruler of both her father’s kingdom (won by drugging a woman and physically abusing her) and Maleficent’s (won by brutally subjugating an autonomous collective using terror and the threat of brute force), so she could forgive or punish the prince as she saw fit.

Avatar
10 years ago

.,
Frankly, it sounds like the Prince was being sexually assaulted by the fairies, in their misguided attempt to save Aurora from the curse.

Avatar
Ethan Edholm
10 years ago

Hi community and more specifically moderators, love the site, but I want to delete my account, maybe join back later. No hard feelings, I promise. How do I make that happen?

Avatar
Josh Luz
10 years ago

Any person who has ever cared about another human being knows that True Love comes in countless forms, but popular fairy tales created for mass-consumption (especially Disney ones) have never bothered to offer an alternative to some young prince who finds his maiden fair. And here it is.

Well, I wouldn’t say “never”. You had a pretty good example last November. Maybe as far as Disney goes, two movies is the beginning of a trend.

Avatar
Epiphyta
10 years ago

If it comes to that, are we not counting Merida and Elinor in Brave?

Avatar
10 years ago

EAP, thanks for the great analysis. This wasn’t looking like my kind of movie but maybe now I’ll go.

I agree that having Maleficient’s heart be broken/betrayed by a love interest/boyfriend is fairly conventional, but it sounds like laying a good conventional foundation helps the unconventional ending. “Hell hath no fury…” and all of that.

Avatar
10 years ago

Oh, and in every still except the one where Malificent is 13, the horns look like a silly hat. They look like part of a black or brown leather skull cap, not an organic part of her head.

Avatar
10 years ago

#15: Woody and Andy. Lilo and her sister. Lilo and Stitch. Rapunzel’s very complicated love of her “mother” was real on her end, at least, and her parents’ love of her was heartbreaking until the happy ending, and very much a plot point, since she ran away to see the floating lights. There’s alot of parental love in old Disney, of course, with characters like Bambi, Dumbo and Simba, though those all follow the theme of using the lessons of one’s beloved parents to carry on without them. Agape like Woody and Andy, or even Woody and Buzz, have is pretty much carried on in every film, though often it’s relegated to the role of the goofy sidekick.

Avatar
10 years ago

My daughter and I went to see Maleficent this last weekend and both of us enjoyed it. Yes it had some plot hole problems but it was still a good movie.

Like Brave and Frozen before it it is awesome to see a story where true love doesn’t have anything to do with romantic love. I really like how we’re getting strong women characters who are not there just to be saved by men in these movies. It really helps my cause when I tell my daughter she can do anything that boys can do or anything she wants to do for that matter.

As for the for the wings thing, the king had them chained up and locked away so Maleficent couldn’t get them back. It was obvious to me that the wings were trying to get away so they could fly back to their faery owner.

Avatar
10 years ago

@12 Moderator here: we’ve taken care of deleting the account, and you can always email webmaster@tor.com with any additional issues. Thank you!

Avatar
TBGH
10 years ago

As soon as the prince entered the scene and was so awkward and clearly not a hero, I saw all the strings and knew exactly what would happen. My next thought was ‘Wow, all those commentators on tor.com that view everything through the lense of feminism are going to love this.’

The two main women in the film are well-realized and interesting. All the men are charicatures. While turning that trope on its head could be interesting in concept, it’s really just as lazy as the reverse.

Brave and Frozen have gone over the same ground and did it with much better storytelling. If Disney keeps repeating this, I know I’m going to lose interest fast.

Avatar
10 years ago

#20: I got the idea that the men in Frozen are at least interesting? I mean they’re either supporters or villains, but they do their jobs well. I haven’t seen it yet, so I can’t supply my opinion.

Avatar
TBGH
10 years ago

@20
I’d rank them Brave then Frozen and then Maleficent a distant third.

While the villains in Frozen are pretty flat, the supporter is entertaining. A mix of independent outdoorsman, naieve young guy, straight man, and a few leanings toward classic hero make him more than just a stereotype . . . at least to me.

Avatar
Gilmoure
10 years ago

It would have been interesting to see a little more depth with Stephan and the guilt/madness he was sinking into. The brief talk-with-wings was a start. Maybe they could have had younger him still trying to steal something from fairy land or otherwise use his connection to maleficent to his advantage. Set the stage as it were.

Avatar
D
10 years ago

The movie was beautiful (albeit having far too many visual similarities to Avatar for my liking (I loved Avatar, but it was literally a different planet)). But ultimately Maleficent just felt like a series of vignettes to me, in both story and characterization.

Additionally, there were so many issues I had with the fact that they were clearly riffing on/replicating many things from Disney’s Sleeping Beauty (so one can’t say it’s just “it’s own thing and can’t be compared”) yet they changed/botched so many things in the process it was an unsatisfying result (I *so* wanted to love this movie).

Maleficent didn’t just “add the failsafe” of the Kiss… she didn’t even curse her the same way — in Sleeping Beauty she is cursed to prick her finger AND DIE *impressive cackling*

There are so many ways Maleficent was stripped of her own, truly awesome powers in this version, but rather than retread what others have written about so extensively and eloquently, I’ll just provide this link to a review I found particularly thorough and interesting: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1587310/board/thread/230587320

I don’t have a problem with redemption stories or alternate origin stories, or shades of grey rather than black and white (because hey, that’s life), but in this movie the Mistress of All Evil never did anything “evil”! Only Stefan did!

So that’s fine if you want to make a completely new movie inspired by a character you saw once that got your imagination spinning, but why strip one of the great villains of all time of any of her actual power and real “teeth” and just turn her into a prank-playing softie from beginning to end?

Avatar
D
10 years ago

By the by – in that review I linked to above, the OP makes an excellent point about the original Sleeping Beauty actually having 4 older women as the main characters of the movie. I thought I should point this out in case anyone wasn’t inclined to click the link, but would be now… it’s well worth reading for this and other reasons if you’re interested in fairy tales and feminism: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1587310/board/thread/230587320?p=1

Personally, I think it would be nice to get a massive scale movie like this that for once neither the men nor the women are painted as “useless” or “backup props” for the main character of the opposite gender.

Neither end of that spectrum (which I think both Frozen and Maleficent fall on just as much as the preponderance of cinema does to the opposite extent) doesn’t get me jazzed up and make me want to clap. Sorry.

Avatar
CHip137
10 years ago

@18: exactly so. The wings got active when Maleficent was near and in danger, showing Aurora they needed to be let out; the only other time Maleficent was near she was in control, and nobody was going to interfere with them in the king’s private study (solar?).

Emily — I think you’re also wrong about Maleficent’s casus belli. A long time ago I learned to fly (private planes and hang gliding); this is the only movie I’ve seen(*) that gives some sense of the sheer joy that untethered flight must be. To me, she’s much more distressed by the loss of her wings than by being tricked/dumped/….

(*) Get to Know Your Dragon 2 is looking even better from the trailers, but it’s not a movie yet.

Avatar
Edward Haines
10 years ago

My son saw this film, and, as a 16 year old boy, he hated how man/boy hating the movie’s message was. This is the problem with “setting right the past”, you just make a parallel evil. Boys need to know that the culture has a path for them to become good men, and this movie doesn’t give it, even as an afterthought. At best, men are irrelevant, unless they are conjured out of crows, and bounded to servitude under a conflicted benevolent all-powerful queen.

Avatar
JUNO
1 year ago
Reply to  Edward Haines

 and bounded to servitude under a conflicted benevolent all-powerful queen.

I think a lot of men would be down with tthat

Avatar
9 years ago

Doubt anybody will see this, but we finally saw it, and man, I hated it. I wanted to like it (Sleeping Beauty is one of my favorite movies) but it was just so irritating in so many ways.

The only great thing about it, as has been mentioned, was Angelina Jolie’s performance.  And I also laughed a bit at Philip’s role being turned on his head and lampshading the ridiculousness of kissing a sleeping girl he just met and calling it true love.  And I found it kind of funny that Maleficent’s curse backfires in that she too loves Aurora.

But…OMG.  Maybe I just like my villains to be villains sometimes, but I don’t think they made Maleficent any more complex or interesting.  It started out with promise, and the scene where Stefan cuts off her wings was truly shocking to me. But…she’s one of the most badass villains in Disney, and she spends her time playing petty pranks on the 3 fairies? AND SHE DOESN’T EVEN GET TO BE A DRAGON??? Even her curse is a lighter version of the real one. Where is the Maleficent that makes the badass boast that to face her is to face ALL THE POWERS OF HELL!

(I can kind of understand the meta aspect; they’re playing up that version as negative propaganda and maybe attempting to make a statement about one dimensional female villains, or powerful women, or something. All stuff I usually am very interested in watching. But it didn’t work for me here).

Also, the plot motivations made nooooo sense!  Why would the 3 Fairies go to the christening at all, considering that the humans are consistently attacking them. WHY WOULD STEFAN AND THE QUEEN GIVE HIS BABY TO THEM? And why on earth were they reduced to such bumbling, unpleasant idiots????

Why is Auroa the queen at the end, when the Moors don’t need one? Why is the institution of monarchy still persisting there???

As for the true love part – maybe because I’ve already seen Frozen, but I found it obvious from the start where the movie was going to go (I don’t mind that, I think it is a good message…but it’s been done better).

Avatar
9 years ago

I find the comment at 27 interesting…I don’t deny that a 16 year old would have a defensive reaction but I think it is worth considering why.  Is it just because the movie had more female characters than male characters (and in all honesty, I think the female characters were shortchanged here too) and the villain was male, and then there is one other side character who is male and kind of adorkable? Well, welcome to the experience most women have with pretty much every other movie.

(ETA: On, and the crow…honestly, he was one of the more well developed characters in the movie, in my opinion).

Avatar
9 years ago

There are three characters in this film: Maleficent, Aurora, and Diaval. The rest are caricatures. I found Scottish Christian Bale Stefan to be merely laughable than any kind of serious conflicted or dangerous character. I really struggle to find the point the film was trying to make. It seemed more that it wanted a complete 180 reversal for the sake of having a reversal. You want to say that no one’s truly evil and villains are just misunderstood? Fine, but why make the good fairies complete nitwits (they were a little oblivious without their magic in the cartoon, but not THAT bad, and they had redeeming qualities) and the king be completely psychotic and evil? You want to give female characters agency and character depth? All good, but then why take three of the strongest female characters and make them complete nitwits? And why take the best Disney prince of all time and make him a useless afterthought? I feel like this film was more about revenge for faults of the first one then rectifications of them.

I did like how Prince Philip wasn’t made into an asshole though. I like both that he objected to kissing her and that his kiss didn’t work. And I like how he came back at the end like Steve on Full House.

But yeah, like Lisamarie points out, a lot of the motivations (especially regarding the three fairies) don’t make any sense. It’s a case of how they changed the story, but then force the plot back into a semblence of the old story, and not taking into account that the changes really make those plot points non-sensical. It’s a lot like PJ’s Hobbit films and season 5 of Game of Thrones.

And I’m going to have to disagree with you about Diaval; she was totally abusive to him, just in a different way. It’s rather telling when he tells her, “Go ahead, change me into whatever you want, I don’t care anymore.” She is using him as a tool and is totally manipulative of his life-debt to her. Whenever she doesn’t care to have him around, she changes his form against his will. She is also totally dismissive of his objections into turning him into a canine.

I really, really did like Angelina Jolie’s performance here though. She did a great job. Come to think of it, I’m not really sure whether I’ve ever even seen an Angelina Jolie movie before. I get this sense that people are critical of her, and you even alluded to this in your review. But I thought she was great at acting here. So I guess stupid Sony execs are even more stupid?

Avatar
9 years ago

If somebody made a cut of this movie that was JUST the parts Maleficient was in (including kid Maleficent – by the way Emily, I’m so glad you mentioned the perma lipstick because I was kind of weirded out by that myself. I guess fairies just have naturally red lips!), I’d probably watch that again, haha.

ETA: I just realized that’s basically the whole movie, since I can only think of a handful of scenes where she’s NOT in it.  So I don’t know what I’m saying here…

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined